Networked Access Control for IT Managers

You already know firewalls and endpoints have to be protected. What sneaks up on a lot of IT managers is how exposed their access control really is: badge systems wired into the LAN, NAC policies bolted onto a flat network, VPN tunnels punched through old routers, and cloud apps everyone assumes are “just SSO.”

When those pieces are networked and misconfigured, you are not just risking a door opening for the wrong person. You are risking full network compromise, payroll and HR data leakage, and a very long week explaining to leadership why an attacker walked through both your physical and logical defenses.

This is written from the perspective of someone who has had to fix broken access control in real environments. I will walk through the key decisions that make the difference between “we passed the audit” and “this can take a hit and stay standing,” drawing on practical guidance from HID Global, CISA, Fortinet, Frontegg, Portnox, Tanium, and others.

The Real Question: What Would It Take To Hack Your Access Control?

Before talking about tools, ask yourself this: if you were attacking your own networked access control, where would it give way first?

For most environments I see, the weak points cluster in four areas. Credentials and devices are still on legacy tech. The path from edge to core is only partially encrypted or segmented. Logging is noisy but not useful. And governance around identities, roles, and vendors is loose.

The rest of this article is organized around fixing those four areas so a realistic attacker has to work harder at every stage: stealing or forging identity, getting on the wire, moving inside the network, and staying hidden long enough to matter.

Decision 1: Are Your Credentials and Devices Actually Defensible?

Many “modern” access systems are built on very old assumptions. If your badges, readers, or NAC policies are stuck in the past, the rest of your security stack cannot save you.

Retire legacy credentials and protocols

HID Global’s access-control guidance makes a simple but uncomfortable point: if your credentials and reader links are not using strong, modern cryptography, you are effectively broadcasting the keys to your building and your systems.

Legacy low‑frequency proximity cards and unencrypted signaling, such as Wiegand, are still common because they are cheap and “they’ve always worked.” The problem, as summarized in access control best-practice material from multiple vendors, is that these technologies are easy to clone or sniff. A low-cost reader in a backpack near the elevator can copy a badge. An attacker on the wire can record unencrypted reader traffic and replay it.

Modern practice, as recommended by HID Global and Fortinet, is very different. Credentials should be smart cards or mobile IDs with secure elements and secure operating systems, hardened further with PINs or biometrics. Reader-to-controller links should use encrypted, bidirectional protocols such as OSDP secure channel, not legacy one-way wiring.

Imagine a mid-sized company where access cards still use legacy prox tech. A disgruntled contractor copies a badge for the payroll supervisor using a handheld cloner they bought for less than the cost of a tank of gas. They now have after-hours building access, plus the ability to sit down at any unlocked workstation and try to pivot deeper. If those physical credentials were based on modern smart-card or mobile tech, and the readers talked over an encrypted channel, that casual cloning attack becomes much harder.

The same logic applies to IT NAC. Portnox and SecureW2 both position NAC as policy enforcement for who and what connects to your network. That only works if the identity piece is strong: unique credentials, modern cryptography, and device posture checks, not shared passwords and vague MAC filtering.

Harden admin and remote access with MFA and certificates

Once an attacker has any kind of foothold, the next prize is administrative access to your access control itself. CISA’s guidance on securing network infrastructure devices is blunt: whoever controls the routing and management infrastructure controls the data. The same is true for the systems that grant or deny door access or network access.

Modern IAM and access-control guidance from Frontegg, Tanium, and Portnox converges on the same defensive pattern.

Administrative access to your access control management consoles, routers, firewalls, and NAC policy engines must use strong, phishing‑resistant multi-factor authentication, not just passwords. That means at least two factors from different categories, such as a password plus a hardware token, or a password plus a secure mobile authenticator. For PACS controllers and servers, HID Global recommends TLS in a FIPS 140‑2 validated environment, plus rigorous OS hardening and updates.

Certificate-based authentication is emerging as a preferred approach for network access itself. SecureW2, for example, advocates replacing username-and-password Wi‑Fi and VPN access with X.509 certificates issued through managed PKI and Cloud RADIUS. The idea is simple: a device or user gets a unique certificate, policies are enforced based on that certificate, and passwords never transit the network. This lines up with NAC best practices from Fortinet and NordLayer, where device posture and identity drive access decisions in real time.

You can think of this as reducing the “attack surface of convenience.” If passwords are reused, phished, or leaked, MFA and certificates ensure that an attacker still cannot simply log into the controller or NAC policy engine from anywhere on the internet.

A practical example helps. Picture your remote finance manager logging in from a personal laptop on hotel Wi‑Fi to approve payroll. In a weak setup, they connect with a VPN that only checks a password, then reach both the payroll app and the access control admin panel because the VPN hands them broad network access. In a stronger, certificate-based setup with NAC, the laptop must present a valid certificate, pass posture checks, and then is placed into a restricted network segment where only the payroll app is reachable. Administrative interfaces live on a separate, more protected management segment accessible only from hardened admin workstations with MFA.

Decision 2: Is Every Hop Encrypted and Segmented?

Once you have defensible credentials, the next question is whether the data those credentials generate stays confidential and constrained as it moves across your network.

Encrypt end-to-end, from edge to host

HID Global defines end‑to‑end security for physical access control as protecting data at rest and in transit from credential, to reader, to controller, to host. That definition maps neatly onto IT network security principles described in standard references such as Wikipedia’s overview of network security and CISA’s network device guidance.

For a physical access system, that means several concrete things. The credential itself is secure. The reader-to-controller link uses an encrypted protocol such as OSDP secure channel, with tamper detection on the device. Communication between controllers and IO modules is encrypted so card data and door commands are useless if intercepted. Controller-to-host traffic runs over TLS, ideally in a hardened environment that follows federal-grade cryptographic practices. Data on the controller, such as cached cardholder records and event logs, is encrypted at rest, protected by secure elements.

For NAC and general network access, similar principles apply. CISA recommends disabling legacy management protocols such as Telnet and FTP, using encrypted management protocols and SNMPv3 for monitoring, and enforcing modern TLS for all control-plane communications. Portnox reinforces that encryption policies must protect sensitive data in transit and at rest, so even if traffic is captured or a device is lost, the attacker sees only cipher text.

From an operational perspective, this often reveals practical gaps. The VPN might be using strong encryption, but the connection between a legacy access controller and its host server might still be in clear text. Or admin access to switches might be encrypted, yet syslog is being sent unencrypted across shared network segments. A realistic goal is to trace the actual paths that card credentials, login events, and NAC decisions take and ensure no segment of that journey is left unprotected.

Segment like you mean it

Encryption keeps data private. Segmentation limits where an intruder can go if they do get in. CISA’s publications on securing network infrastructure and modern approaches to network access security emphasize segmentation and segregation as core defenses. Routers, VLANs, private VLANs, VRFs, DMZs, and VPNs all combine to create boundaries that align with your business risk.

NAC strengthens segmentation by automating which segment a device or user lands in. Fortinet’s NAC material describes using identity and device posture to place endpoints into specific VLANs or microsegments, and Portnox echoes this by tying NAC policies to VLAN assignment and access control lists. Zero Trust guidance from CISA and Frontegg goes further, recommending that network location should never be enough to confer trust. Every access should be continuously evaluated.

Consider a common scenario: badge readers and door controllers installed across your building, all talking to a central access server. In many environments, those controllers share the same network segment as user workstations and even guest Wi‑Fi. In that setup, a compromised laptop can scan for controllers, try default credentials, and potentially push malicious configurations or exfiltrate cardholder data.

In a segmented setup that follows CISA and HID Global guidance, those controllers live on a dedicated, restricted VLAN. NAC ensures only whitelisted controller MAC addresses with the right certificates join that VLAN, and firewall rules severely limit what that VLAN can reach. Guest Wi‑Fi, corporate desktops, and access controllers each have their own segments, with minimal, tightly controlled rules permitting only required traffic. If an attacker compromises a single device in the office, their ability to reach door controllers or NAC infrastructure is dramatically reduced.

A simple way to visualize the difference is to compare two designs.

Design choice	Risk profile	Better practice
Flat LAN with VPN dropping users “inside”	Broad lateral movement; controllers and admin consoles discoverable from many hosts	Use NAC to place users in role-based segments; isolate controllers and admin consoles on dedicated, locked-down networks
Unencrypted controller-to-host links	Badge and event data exposed to sniffing or replay	Enforce TLS with modern ciphers between controllers and hosts

Even modest improvements like separating guest Wi‑Fi and access-control infrastructure into different VLANs, with firewall rules applying least privilege, bring you much closer to what CISA and NAC vendors describe as a defensible stance.

Decision 3: Do You Actually See What Your Access Control Is Doing?

No matter how tight your controls are on paper, you will eventually face misconfigurations, insider mistakes, or real attacks. The question is whether you see the signal in time to act.

Treat accounting and logging as first-class features

The “AAA” model used by NAC systems, described by NordLayer and SecureW2, is authentication, authorization, and accounting. That last “A” is where many deployments fall short. Accounting means recording who did what, when, from where, and with which device, then turning that data into actionable insight.

HID Global recommends unified management platforms that centralize control of users, permissions, system health, and incidents, with detailed logging and monitoring for real-time detection of suspicious activity. CISA’s hardening and enhanced visibility guidance goes further, calling for centralized, encrypted logging across network devices, with copies stored offsite and correlated in a SIEM. The goal is to establish baselines of normal behavior, alert on unauthorized configuration changes, and rapidly detect anomalies.

Practically, this means your badge system should log every door event, configuration change, and admin login. NAC should log every authentication decision, VLAN or segment assignment, and quarantine action. Routers, switches, and firewalls should log route changes, ACL edits, and management logins. All of that should flow to a central logging and analytics platform, where you can search “who accessed payroll data yesterday between 7:00 PM and 9:00 PM” or “which devices were moved to quarantine last week.”

Tanium cites a striking statistic: up to 85 percent of an organization’s credentials may go unused over a ninety-day period. Without solid logging and auditing, those dormant accounts become invisible risk. Regular access reviews using your logs can surface accounts, badges, and VPN profiles that no one needs but everyone forgot.

Use examples and simple checks that actually catch trouble

Imagine a simple incident. A badge that should have been disabled when a contractor left the company is still active. One night, it is used to enter the warehouse at 11:30 PM, outside normal hours. NAC shows a new device on the network from that location, failing posture checks and hitting sensitive file shares. With well-configured logging and automated policy enforcement, several things happen. The access control system flags the after-hours entry and pushes an alert to security. NAC notices the device posture violation, quarantines the endpoint, and logs the incident. Your SIEM correlates the physical entry with network activity, raising the priority.

Without logging and automated enforcement, that same pattern is easy to miss. The badge swipe might be buried in a local controller log. The new device might look like an ordinary laptop on a flat network. By the time anyone notices, sensitive data could already be exfiltrated.

Organizations can start small. Use guidance from ICO on practical IT security and from Frontegg and Portnox on audit and review to define a simple set of questions you answer every month. For example, which high-privilege badges have not been used in ninety days, which admin accounts have never logged in, which controllers or switches have configuration changes outside change windows, and which devices have been repeatedly quarantined by NAC. Answering those questions regularly, with real data, forces your logging pipeline to be useful instead of ornamental.

Decision 4: Are Operations and Governance Built for Zero Trust?

Technology alone does not keep access control from being hacked. The policies, roles, and habits around those tools determine whether your defenses stay sharp over time.

Get identities, roles, and lifecycle under control

Access control guidance from Frontegg, Tanium, and ACRE Security all stress the same lifecycle: authenticate, authorize, manage, and audit. Modern IAM and NAC vendors like Frontegg and NordLayer recommend centralizing identities into a single directory, enforcing role-based and attribute-based access, and aligning everything to least privilege and Zero Trust.

Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), highlighted by Frontegg, PrimeSecured, and several NAC vendors, is a practical way to do this. Instead of giving every new hire bespoke permissions, you define roles such as “Payroll Specialist,” “IT Network Admin,” or “Visitor,” then tie access to those roles across both physical and logical systems. Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) and policy-based models add more context, such as location, time of day, device type, and risk score.

Tanium underlines how dangerous it is to leave account lifecycle unmanaged, quoting how many credentials sit unused. NordLayer, Portnox, and Coalition all point out that networks are constantly changing with new cloud services, locations, and remote workers. That means you need disciplined onboarding and offboarding, automated removal of orphaned accounts, and regular certification of who should have what.

From a small business operations angle, connect this to something tangible like payroll. If a departing employee’s badge stays active and their VPN account is never removed, they can potentially keep clocking time at perimeter doors, manipulating systems that feed payroll, or accessing HR data. Strong IAM and NAC tied to HR systems can automatically disable badges, VPN profiles, and application roles as soon as HR marks the departure, reducing both cyber risk and payroll fraud risk.

Make people, training, and playbooks part of the security stack

Guidance from ICO on small-organization security, and from CISA on securing network infrastructure, both emphasize staff awareness and clear responsibilities. Employees do not always see themselves as part of security, but their behavior can enable or defeat attackers.

Train your support and security teams to understand NAC policies, access control alerts, and logging tools. SecureW2 explicitly calls out the need for trained teams who can run advanced NAC without relying entirely on vendors. HID Global suggests that staff should know how to work with threat levels, lockdowns, and duress signals in access control platforms. ICO encourages regular training on phishing and safe handling of data, which matters because a single phished admin can undo a lot of good technical design.

Operationally, this comes down to having playbooks instead of ad hoc reactions. How do you respond if a controller goes offline in a remote cabinet at 2:00 AM? Who investigates a possible cloned badge? What happens if NAC starts quarantining large numbers of devices after a patch? CISA’s incident response and configuration management guidance encourages rehearsing those scenarios before you are in the middle of them.

An easy starting point is a short, cross-functional exercise. Walk through a scenario where a contractor’s credentials are abused to access both a building and a critical application. Put facilities, IT, security, and HR in the same room. Ask who would notice, who would decide to lock down controllers or NAC, who would revoke credentials, and who would communicate with staff and leadership. The gaps you uncover tell you where to refine governance long before a real attacker tests it for you.

Decision 5: Are You Choosing and Running the Right NAC and PACS Platform?

Many organizations inherit an access control system from a construction project or an old network refresh and then try to retrofit security onto it. Given the stakes, it is worth stepping back and asking whether your current platform can support the practices you need.

HID Global’s Aero controller line, Fortinet’s NAC solutions, and network access offerings from vendors such as NordLayer and Portnox all highlight similar capabilities as table stakes.

Capability	Why it matters	What to check in your environment
Strong encryption and secure protocols	Prevents sniffing, replay, and tampering across reader, controller, NAC, and management paths	Support for OSDP secure channel, TLS with modern ciphers, SNMPv3, secure AAA
Integration with IAM and directories	Aligns network and door access with roles and identity lifecycle	Native integration with your directory, SSO, and HR systems
Automation and dynamic policy	Responds to threats in real time, enforcing Zero Trust principles	Ability to quarantine devices, change threat levels, adjust privileges on the fly
Scalability and reliability	Keeps running under load and during growth without fragile workarounds	Rated capacity, redundancy options, proven operation under harsh conditions
Legacy interoperability and migration	Lets you phase out weak tech without shutting down operations	Backward compatibility with existing readers or modules, migration tooling

ACRE Security and Proptia both stress the importance of proper design and implementation. They recommend assessing sensitive areas and assets, defining clear access levels, choosing the right mix of technologies (cards, biometrics, mobile), ensuring correct installation and integration, and planning for future growth and compliance needs.

Fortinet, NordLayer, and Portnox emphasize that NAC must align with your actual network size, device diversity, enforcement needs, and regulatory requirements. A solution that works for a small office might not handle a campus full of IoT devices; a platform optimized for cloud-native environments may not cover older on-premises controllers without additional work.

From an operational standpoint, look at total cost over time, not just licensing. HID Global notes that durable, reliable hardware capable of running under harsh conditions with maximum load reduces maintenance cost and unpredictable downtime. Automation capabilities, open APIs, and integrations with your existing monitoring, HR, and ticketing systems also reduce the human time required to keep access control well tuned.

Example Walkthrough: Hardening a Networked Door and NAC Path

To bring the pieces together, imagine you are responsible for a networked door that guards the server room where your payroll and HR systems live. The door has a reader connected to a controller, which sits in a network closet and talks to an access control server on your core network. Staff badges also grant network access through your Wi‑Fi using NAC.

A hardened design inspired by HID Global and CISA would look something like this. The badge is a secure smart card or mobile credential, protected by a PIN or biometric. The reader speaks OSDP secure channel to the controller, with tamper detection enabled. The controller sits in a locked cabinet on a dedicated, access-controlled VLAN. That VLAN is only allowed to talk to the access control server over TLS, with mutual certificate authentication and cipher suites aligned to modern recommendations.

The controller stores only encrypted data at rest, with OS hardening, minimal services enabled, and SNMPv3 used for monitoring its health. Out-of-band management is used for configuration, following CISA guidance, so administrative traffic does not share routes with normal business traffic. Only hardened admin workstations on a management network can reach the controller’s management interfaces, all protected by MFA and AAA servers enforcing least privilege.

On the network side, NAC identifies each staff device using certificates issued by your PKI, as described by SecureW2, and assesses device posture. A compliant laptop belonging to a payroll employee is placed into a segment that can reach the payroll application and relevant file shares, but not the controller VLAN or general admin networks. A guest device or BYOD endpoint gets a different segment with internet access but no internal systems.

All events flow into your SIEM. Door opens, badge errors, controller health alerts, NAC quarantines, admin logins, and configuration changes are logged. Baselines and alerts follow the guidance from CISA and Portnox so you can spot anomalies, such as a sudden wave of failed badge attempts or configuration changes outside change windows.

Physically, you apply principles seen in perimeter security and ISO 27001 annex guidance. The controller cabinet is locked and, if it is in a semi-public area such as a shared corridor, protected by layered physical measures that deter, detect, delay, and enable response. That might mean clear signage, secure enclosures, and where appropriate, surveillance and alarm monitoring.

If you compare that to the all-too-common reference design of a cheap reader wired over legacy protocols to a controller on the flat LAN, managed over clear-text protocols from any admin laptop, you can see how each hardened element raises the bar.

Brief FAQ

How is NAC different from a traditional VPN?

A traditional VPN largely creates a tunnel and then drops the user “inside” your network, which CISA notes has led to many misconfigurations and exposures. NAC enforces policies about which users and devices can connect, under what conditions, and with what level of privilege. Modern guidance from CISA and vendors like Fortinet and NordLayer positions NAC as part of Zero Trust, where every connection is evaluated continuously instead of trusted just because it is on a VPN.

Do small and mid-sized businesses really need this level of rigor?

Regulators, attackers, and customers do not carve out exemptions for company size. ICO’s advice for small organizations makes clear that all businesses holding personal data have to protect it, and NAC vendors like Coalition and Portnox stress that remote access pathways are now primary attack vectors for smaller firms as well. You do not need every advanced feature on day one, but you do need a plan to retire legacy tech, enforce least privilege, and monitor what matters.

Where should I start if everything feels legacy?

Start where the blast radius is largest and the upgrade path is realistic. Guidance from HID Global, CISA, Fortinet, and IAM providers like Frontegg and Tanium all suggest similar early moves. Replace unencrypted credentials and protocols on your highest-risk doors, segment and harden the network path for access controllers and NAC appliances, centralize logging, and tie access roles to a single source of truth. Even a handful of focused changes can dramatically reduce your exposure while you plan deeper modernization.

You do not need a science experiment to keep networked access control from getting hacked. You need defensible credentials, fully encrypted and segmented paths, logging that tells you what is really happening, and governance that does not let old badges and accounts linger forever. Make those decisions deliberately, lean on the patterns validated by CISA, HID Global, Fortinet, Frontegg, Portnox, Tanium, and others, and your access control stops being a soft target and starts working for you like it should. As The Operations Fixer, that is the kind of quiet reliability you want on your résumé and in your network.

References

About the author

Silas Mercer

Small Business Efficiency StrategistWorkforce Management ConsultantCloud Systems Integration Specialist

Silas Mercer doesn't just track time; he reclaims it. With over 15 years of experience turning chaotic back-offices into well-oiled machines, Silas creates content for business owners tired of payroll errors and time theft.

As a pragmatic 'Operations Fixer,' he specializes in bridging the gap between complex cloud technology and everyday small business needs. His mission? To help you implement NGTECO’s AWS-secured solutions to automate attendance, ensure compliance, and focus on what really matters: growth. No jargon, just results.

Your cart is currently empty.

To IT Managers: How to Ensure Networked Access Control Isn’t Hacked